The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Seemingly routine coverage of events by the organization, no
WP:SIGCOV or
WP:NORG to denote for notability.
nearlyevil665 04:41, 27 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Hello,@
Nearlyevil665: the page was created (by me) in a rush in order to make decisions
there clearer, would you please consider withdrawing until the other Afd is closed? Thanks.-
My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 07:51, 27 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete Per nom, fails GNG and NORG. Source in the article and found in BEFORE are event promo, mill news, nothing that meets WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. //
Timothy ::
talk 18:14, 27 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Sigh....OK, so much for temporary withdrawal but hey. All right, then, keep. Enough independent reliable sources covering the subject. Some are even on the page....A lot more exists, just click news for example.
O Globo mentioned its
25 years of existence or
this. The festival has been repeatedly described by reliable sources as the main Brazilian film event outside Brazil. Also see
Veja (
here) or
this. ETC. Not notable, how?-
My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 19:28, 27 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep: I also found
this article in The Vancouver Sun discussing Inffinito's Brazilian Film Festival in the context of appreciation of Brazilian film.
Toughpigs (
talk) 17:12, 28 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep as there are now a number of reliable sources used in the article such as multiple Brazilian newspapers and Canadian newspapers so that
WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view,
Atlantic306 (
talk) 00:16, 31 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep. I think there is a valid concern about whether the sources are simply
routine coverage. However, my judgment is that these sources show there is something notable here, and putting the content under the umbrella of the parent organization seems like a reasonable editorial decision at this time.--Mojo Hand(
talk) 15:34, 4 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.