Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Indian_village_christ_lutheran_church References

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 21:35, 13 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Indian village christ lutheran church

(Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be WP:NOTABLE; possibly promotional. Boleyn ( talk) 19:05, 6 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Sending WP:APPNOTE to JJMC89. Boleyn ( talk) 19:11, 6 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Delete - unsourced article that fails WP:GNG. — JJMC89 ( T· E· C) 19:49, 6 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Delete: Pretty obviously ported from someone's promotional website or the "About Us" link somewhere. Meanwhile, the article is useless. (Has a whole generation lost its thumb and become unable to find the shift key and capitalize? Or do people think that proper nouns don't need capital letters. . . even "Christ?") After one deciphers the title, it's pointing at a "Lutheran Church" called "Christ Lutheran Church" at a place called "Indian Village" in some US state or some nation. Hithladaeus ( talk) 01:06, 7 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Delete Non-notable and promotional. I suspect it's also a copyvio, but the copyvio checker isn't working for me right now. Joseph2302 ( talk) 01:18, 7 June 2015 (UTC) reply

(Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete – Does not meet WP:N. After several searches, only found one passing mention here, in the Grosse Pointe News. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:16, 7 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Delete. I would have speedied as spam if I'd got there first Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:44, 7 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:44, 8 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:44, 8 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:44, 8 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:45, 8 June 2015 (UTC) reply

(Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Substantial RS coverage not found in search. The article's tone is promotional because it's a paraphrase copy of the church's website. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:58, 8 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Delete. Highly promotional page on a non-notable topic. No obvious coverage in reliable sources. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 14:22, 8 June 2015 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.