From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 03:10, 4 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Inbound marketing

Inbound marketing (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

pure jargon, non-encyclopedic; the relevant encyclopedic aspects are covered in multiple articles DGG ( talk ) 06:48, 19 January 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 08:23, 19 January 2021 (UTC) reply


I agree 100%, this article is rubbish and it's content is far too minimal to warrant an article. Definitely should go Chariotsacha ( talk) 04:01, 23 January 2021 (UTC) reply

This is WP:ITEXISTS. It's definitely a term; it's probably not a relevant one. Vaticidalprophet ( talk) 09:44, 27 January 2021 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northern Escapee ( talk) 06:22, 27 January 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.