The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Although "multiple" has never been defined to my knowledge, in practice "multiple" has been interpreted to mean "at least two". It appears the topic meets this definition. There is no policy that says "more than 3".
78.26(
spin me /
revolutions) 19:13, 4 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep actor name is Imran Abbas as per
this Dawn piece and he played lead role in
Laaj. As per
The Nation story, he acted in
Salute (2016 film) as Taliban which I assume some major role. The IMDb entry on actor claims he has acted in few more films but I am unable to locate coverage in RS but I think borderline passes
WP:ACTORBIO. --
Saqib (
talk) 19:21, 12 April 2018 (UTC)reply
OK. The subject has acted in at least 3 notable films. (
Waar,
Salute, and
Laaj). 3 = multiple. --
Saqib (
talk) 04:30, 17 April 2018 (UTC)reply
No, I would say a few more than 3 would constitute multiple. And in a recent AfD discussion,
[1], you said The article cite only 3. So 3 weren't sufficient then, it shouldn't be now. I don't get this
moving the goalpost fallacy.
M A A Z T A L K 04:32, 26 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Haroon Janjua is not an actor.there are different standards applied to different article topics for establishing notability. --
Saqib (
talk) 05:15, 26 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:59, 19 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:28, 26 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep It's borderline, but multiple means "more than 1" (EDIT: or "more than 2") not "more than 3". --
Ahecht (
TALK PAGE) 22:37, 26 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Uhhhh. I think multiple is more closely defined as several or many. I would put 2 or 3 more like in the few or some category.
M A A Z T A L K 05:37, 1 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Merriam Webster defines multiple as "consisting of, including, or involving more than one". The OED, however, defines it as "Having or involving several parts", but if you look up the OED definition of several, it is "More than two but not many". In other words, there are definitions that define it as more than 1 or more than 2, but I haven't found any that say more than 3. --
Ahecht (
TALK PAGE) 15:50, 1 May 2018 (UTC)reply
I think, the multiple thing is never specified in Wikipedia guidelines, owing to controversy in opinions.
M A A Z T A L K 00:41, 2 May 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.