The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (
talk) 20:28, 3 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Ron Ritzman (
talk) 01:04, 20 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete. There are no independent, reliable sources that discuss the film in depth in the article and I can't find any via google. There's a fairly robust web presence but all the substantial coverage I saw was in unreliable sources and all the reliable sources were minor mentions.
Eluchil404 (
talk) 07:11, 21 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton |
Talk 16:24, 27 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete per Eluchil404's research and reasoning.
Drawn Some (
talk) 16:26, 27 August 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete as above.
Eusebeus (
talk) 15:41, 3 September 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.