From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 02:41, 3 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Imperial Party of New Zealand

Imperial Party of New Zealand (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject is not notable. The only link in the article is to the party's own website, and I was not able to find any sources elsewhere. HenryCrun15 ( talk) 02:34, 27 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. HenryCrun15 ( talk) 02:34, 27 July 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. HenryCrun15 ( talk) 02:34, 27 July 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Speedy delete No assertion of notability, lol geocities Reywas92 Talk 06:38, 27 July 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Not registered, never ran candidates, so not notable. Not active so no case for waiting a few weeks until nomination deadline.-- IdiotSavant ( talk) 13:30, 27 July 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Micro political party. I found nothing online. Lefcentreright Discuss 20:46, 27 July 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom and the other comment above. Olaf Kosinsky ( talk) 12:18, 2 August 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.