The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
✗plicit 04:34, 15 August 2021 (UTC)reply
WP:BLP of a person with no
properly sourced indication of notability. The notability claim here is that he has a job that isn't "inherently" notable for the purposes of securing automatic inclusion rights in Wikipedia, and the sole reference for it is his profile on the
self-published website of a directly affiliated organization rather than any evidence of independent third party media coverage about him.
Bearcat (
talk) 05:18, 2 August 2021 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk) 06:55, 9 August 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete – all I could find is
this, which seems to be little more than an interview. Unless I'm missing some sort of actual secondary coverage, he fails the
GNG.
Extraordinary Writ (
talk) 03:02, 10 August 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.