- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 09:03, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Igor (Discworld)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Igor (Discworld) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fictional race. It is a rather clear fail of WP:GNG/ WP:NFICTION, and BEFORE does not show much to use as sources, only primary books and a bit of fancruft here and there. This is pure WP:PLOT summary. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:29, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:29, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:29, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Unreferenced fancruft/Wikia material. Not notable enough for a standalone article. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 10:18, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete total failure of GNG. The article lacks the multiple, reliable 3rd party sources. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 13:20, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete, A mass of unreferenced in-universe material that fails GNG and WP:PLOT. Devonian Wombat ( talk) 03:39, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.