The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Front Sight Firearms Training Institute. And merge to the extent desired and appropriate.  Sandstein  09:18, 22 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Ignatius Piazza

Ignatius Piazza (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is almost entirely sourced from articles from a publication called Front Sight that the subject founded. Many of the articles cited in WP article are written by the subject. There is no indication that the subject is notable. Therefore, article fails WP:BLP and WP:GNG. Delta13C ( talk) 01:52, 29 November 2015 (UTC) reply

• Keep While the article is somewhat slanted and not well written, the subject matter is notable, a cursory glance on google and google news reveals a number of articles from various news sources. Jab843 ( talk) 04:23, 29 November 2015 (UTC) reply

• I did a Google News search and found a few sources, but they do not cover the subject in depth. They seem to only quote him as a person with a known stance on pro-gun point of view, especially after a shooting: [1], plus this is the exact same text [2], [3], [4]. I cannot find any sources that cover subject in depth. Delta13C ( talk) 09:49, 29 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. GSS ( talk) 09:05, 6 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. GSS ( talk) 09:05, 6 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 23:55, 13 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Firearms-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 23:55, 13 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 23:55, 13 December 2015 (UTC) reply

• Redirect to FrontSight Institute' or also simply delete as there's quite considerable coverage but it may currently be best to move it to the institute's article for now. SwisterTwister talk 06:25, 16 December 2015 (UTC) reply
• Keep or possibly merge to FrontSight Institute. Horrid writing aside, it can be improved.-- Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 22:28, 16 December 2015 (UTC) reply
• REDIRECT and/or MERGE to FrontSight Institute. Everything in the article is directly or indirectly related to FrontSight anyway.-- RAF910 ( talk) 00:44, 17 December 2015 (UTC) reply

• Comment: The article Front Sight Firearms Training Institute may also not meet GNG for organizations (WP:ORG). It's also very problematic that the article cites low quality sources, like it own website and its facebook posts. Delta13C ( talk) 06:56, 17 December 2015 (UTC) reply
• Comment: Fair enough...then we should discuss deleting the Front Sight article as well.-- RAF910 ( talk) 18:46, 17 December 2015 (UTC) reply

• Merge to Front Sight. then discuss the combined article at afd . In most cases like this a single article is stronger; we should first construct the most sustainable article that we can, and then to see if even it is actually notable. DGG ( talk ) 05:35, 20 December 2015 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.