The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
No independent references, and I've been unable to find anything more than a trivial mention. Severe content issues in all versions, and a very generic name such that there may be multiple groups of the same name.
power~enwiki (
π,
ν) 18:49, 16 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete, no refs in the article, nothing I can see on google, their website hasn't been updated since 2013, never notable and now defunct in my opinion.
Szzuk (
talk) 18:29, 23 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Courcelles (
talk) 03:04, 24 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete - With no sources and this much detail (including an old Wikipedia entry?) it's hard to see this as anything but unduly promotional. No objection to userfying if someone wants to strip it down and provide reliable sources. — Rhododendritestalk \\ 19:26, 26 April 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.