The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete No indication this process satisfies
notability.
Edison (
talk) 15:19, 17 August 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete The article creator only has made this one edit - likely advertising
MadCow257 (
talk) 15:44, 17 August 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete - unreferenced, unencyclopedic, no indication of notability, created by an
SPA.
Dialectric (
talk) 17:18, 17 August 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete. Lacks independent secondary sources
WP:RS to establish notability as required by
WP:GNG and
WP:CORPDEPTH. Google searches turn up download sites, etc., but nothing that could be used to establish notability. I applaud all entrepreneurs who take it upon themselves to create stuff. But the article is written as an advertisement, clearly intended as
WP:PROMOTION, lacks sources and doesn't belong here. Sorry. If you want your article here, you'll first need to pester some journalists into agreeing it's notable enough that they should take note and write about it. My rule of thumb is that you need two good articles from traditional print sources to establish notability for a new software product.
Msnicki (
talk) 18:58, 17 August 2011 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.