The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
No indication of reasonable notability. Sources given are not independent. Subject does not satisfy
WP:GNG.
Safiel (
talk) 00:50, 24 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete - I have some questions about
Pixable too, but at least that has received some coverage. The subject here hasn't really and the sources in question (which include LinkedIn and his own company's website) don't confer notability by way of
significant coverage in multiple reliable sources.
Stalwart111 03:22, 24 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Lankiveil(
speak to me) 11:06, 4 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete.
WP:NOT#CV. The article reads like a CV, is heavily cited to primary sources or directories. The only citation that is from an RS makes only trivial mention of the start-up created by Berenguer. -- Ohc ¡digame! 13:12, 4 March 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.