- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Anarchyte ( work | talk) 06:31, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
Horace Ladymon
- Horace Ladymon ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Looks like a WP:PROMO to me. Only notable for being a president of one corporation. Fails WP:NBIO. jd22292 ( Jalen D. Folf) ( talk) 00:09, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:46, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:47, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:47, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete With four citations to Find a Grave, the subject clearly isn't notable. Chris Troutman ( talk) 14:24, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete The article is a mix of non-reliable sources (ancestry, at least when it is not a primary source) and primary sources. The article is more at the level of a geneological entry, proving someone is a link in a family, than proving they are notable. Mere existence is not the inclusion criteria for Wikipedia. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 15:30, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.