The result was delete. Lots of "keep" arguments tossed due to weak interpretation of guidelines and readily apparent sock-puppetry. A Train talk 19:15, 2 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Per this tagging, and the fact that there is no assertion of notability. Giggy U C P 07:55, 27 July 2007 (UTC) reply
Also, it was featured in the Todd County Standard, July 17th 2007. The book is also to be sold at Borders, Joseph Beth, and on Amazon - maybe crystal balling but never the less, seems quite valid
Under these two clauses does the book meet Wikipedia's standards
The book's author is so historically significant that any of his or her written works may be considered notable, even in the absence of secondary sources.[6] Per this and other articles - [1]
The book has been the subject [1] of multiple, non-trivial[2] published works whose sources are independent of the book itself,[3] with at least some of these works serving a general audience. This includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, other books, television documentaries and reviews. Some of these works should contain sufficient critical commentary to allow the article to grow past a simple plot summary.
- As stated that the book was reviwed in the Kentucky New Era on July 16th, and in the Todd County Standard on July 18th. -- Benny the bureaucrat 03:40, 30 July 2007 (UTC) reply