The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Clearly
WP:BLPCRIME,
WP:NOTNEWS. He has not yet been convicted of arson, which is the only charge against him. wumbolo^^^ 20:53, 12 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete per nominator. He is accused, not convicted, so aren't their
WP:BLP issues too?
...William, is the complaint department really on
the roof? 00:04, 13 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete as a pseudobiography of one arrest. Clear
WP:BLPCRIME violation. Without a conviction, even the title is a BLP violation. Zero biographical depth. The crime may be a notable event, but that doesn't mean the alleged perpetrator should get a Wikipedia article.
• Gene93k (
talk) 12:37, 13 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete as
WP:TOOSOON, if he is convicted then the subject can be reconsidered such as through
WP:AFC, I'm adding a speedy for blp violation
Atlantic306 (
talk) 13:20, 13 April 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.