The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete - No reliable sourcing. Most of the sourcing is
UGC, or
passing mentions. Neither of which are reliable in any way.
🌺Kori🌺 - (
@) 20:53, 18 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. It exists and hosted a local meeting. No significant coverage in
WP:RS. --Kinut/c 07:24, 20 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete fails
WP:GNG, due to the lack of sources covering the temple in detail.
Cedix (
talk) 13:16, 25 April 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.