The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete -- no citations to 3rd party RS. Two sources listed are in-universe, such as "an accessory for the 2nd edition of the Advanced Dungeons & Dragons fantasy role-playing game".
K.e.coffman (
talk) 21:15, 8 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Merge per BOZ and
WP:ATD-M. I'll note that K.e.coffman's opinion is not policy based, in that primary sources are perfectly acceptable to verify uncontroversial content; they just don't count towards notability.
Jclemens (
talk) 05:12, 10 July 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.