From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 23:43, 1 October 2022 (UTC) reply

Hest Bank South Junction

Hest Bank South Junction (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Relies entirely on 1 source, 128 years old. Clearly fails WP:GNG, along with its sister page at the north junction. Rly junctions generally do not merit their own articles. Mattdaviesfsic ( talk) 18:06, 21 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:50, 28 September 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Delete, fails WP:GNG. Horse Eye's Back ( talk) 16:26, 30 September 2022 (UTC) reply
  • delete as this gets more hits under its current name, but either way there are very few, mostly completist listings and name drops for photos of taken at this fairly accessible site. As a junction, it's unremarkable, and there's no claim to significance made in the article or anywhere else I could find. Mangoe ( talk) 14:10, 1 October 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.