The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Deletion arguments referenced policy, the only keep argument did not. Daniel ( talk) 03:47, 22 January 2021 (UTC) reply

Heritage Christian School (Kelowna)

Heritage Christian School (Kelowna) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was kept at AFD in 2012 under the then-existing consensus that K-12 schools were presumptively notable. In 2017, that consensus was reversed: schools must now satisfy WP:ORG. See WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. This article does not meet WP:ORG: it is sourced only to the school's website. I can find nothing online except routine news coverage, most of it revolving around athletics and COVID-19 cases. It does not approach the multiple significant independent reliable secondary sources that are required. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 17:28, 14 January 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 17:28, 14 January 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 17:28, 14 January 2021 (UTC) reply

• Delete the sourcing is no where near what we expect for an organization. To be fail a lot of our high school articles have been grandfathered in under the old system, but since Wikipedia is not a reliable source, we should not grandfather in any articles. All the more so because our early inclusion criteria were virtually non-existent. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 18:21, 14 January 2021 (UTC) reply
• Keep the community where this school is located has a number of schools with articles; removing just this one and leaving the others is inappropriate when notability level are similar: Kelowna#Education-- Epiphyllumlover ( talk) 23:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC) reply
• Delete Due to it lacking the sourcing needed to be notable. Also, not sure what Epiphyllumlover is talking about, but it sounds a lot like WP:OTHERSTUFF. -- Adamant1 ( talk) 09:33, 17 January 2021 (UTC) reply
• Comment If this schools is non-notable, than neither are the other schools in this community. The most obvious solution is to make an article for all of the schools and merge it in. Or just leave them all alone. But to single out one to delete makes no sense.-- Epiphyllumlover ( talk) 04:01, 18 January 2021 (UTC) reply
• Delete per nom. lacks SIGCOV from IS RS to pass ORGCRIT. OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid reason to keep and merging lots of non-notable articles into one big non-notable article will not improve the situation.  //  Timothy ::  t |  c |  a   13:46, 18 January 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.