- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:27, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Herbert S. Feinberg
- Herbert S. Feinberg ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Pure advertisement for a dermatologist with no encyclopedic notability The likely situation here is that this was written by an undeclared paid editor, because nobody else would write an article where the lead paragraph lists the procedures they do, just like advertisements for dermatologist in the subway. . As for notability, he wrote one book, now in only 120 libraries which is trivial for popular medicine. Only one published paper, cited only twice. The third party references are the usual PR. (if I were a paid editor, I would never even have accepted this job) DGG ( talk ) 22:37, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete for reasons given above. Shelbystripes ( talk) 22:46, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:30, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:30, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:30, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete -- Written as WP:PROMO fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG-- EC Racing ( talk) 16:23, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete dermatologists are only a little below plastic surgeons as being overly self promoting doctors. OK, way below plastic surgeons, but in either case we have nothing beyond promotional sourcing. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 15:28, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.