The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete--
Ymblanter (
talk) 07:41, 21 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete Notability not established. Eight years after its creation the article is still no more than a stub - just 4 sentences!
DaveApter (
talk) 10:43, 12 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
NorthAmerica1000 09:35, 13 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete a lawyer having an obit in a law journal does not confer notability. Nor does contributing to a book - there is no indication what the contribution was. The burden of persuasion is on those who claim notability to show it, they have fallen quite short. Fails
WP:GNG.
Carlossuarez46 (
talk) 17:50, 14 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete No real assertion of notability. He wrote a few articles and gave a few talks is all the article says.
Borock (
talk) 01:27, 21 October 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.