The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep per
WP:PROF #1, "significant impact in their scholarly discipline" as demonstrated by sources, and PROF #5 "held a named chair appointment". The Festschrift currently cited shows some significant impact. Moreover,
Otto Jespersen includes a section on Koziol and his Handbuch der englischen Wortbildunglehre in Jespersen's A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. I would guess more sources may be available in German. Also, I'm not certain whether the Austrian Academy of Sciences is selective in the way that The Royal Society is, but if so he also satisfies PROF #3. I assume, based on the current content of the article, that COI issues are surmountable.
Cnilep (
talk) 01:36, 19 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:39, 20 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep – as stated in the notability guidelines Academics/professors
WP:NACADEMIC meeting any one of the following conditions, as substantiated through reliable sources, are notable. And as
Cnilep pointed out above Prof. Koziol definitively meets #1 - 3 and 5. ShoesssSTalk 15:01, 20 April 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.