- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 02:25, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Henry Hazlitt bibliography
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Henry Hazlitt bibliography ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
We've covered this ground before: Wikipedia is not for bibliographies, and this one is just incredibly complete--and that is the positive spin. Listing every individual article the man ever published is of interest only to specialists, very few specialists. There may well be another project that this will fit in nicely, but we are not it. Drmies ( talk) 23:03, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:21, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:NOTDIR. In 2020, everybody knows we are not a web host for random information, nor are we a directory. Bearian ( talk) 17:16, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete as WP:NOTBIBLIOGRAPHY, no issue with having Hazlitt's books only listed at Henry Hazlitt#Publications. Coolabahapple ( talk) 08:19, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete,Per above, contents put in Wikipedia should serve as encyclopedia WP:NOTBIBLIOGRAPHY. Alex-h ( talk) 09:47, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.