- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Randykitty ( talk) 12:23, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Hemendra Aran
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Hemendra Aran ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Near-certain product of undisclosed paid editing. Visible attempts at Ref-bombing but once it is torn apart, I don't locate anything worthwhile.
Yeah, he has written for reliable publication-houses but that does not count towards notability and he fails WP:NAUTHOR by a mile. Neither does he pass WP:NACADEMIC nor does he pass WP:NFILMMAKER. In totality, the subject fails the general notability guidelines as well as the subject notability guidelines comprehensively.
And, after a due search; I failed to progress any toward his' meeting our guidelines. ∯WBG converse 12:04, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
Redirect to Aranca Research which they founded. That company probably fails WP:NCORP, but that's a different article. Nothing in this article is enough to meet notability for Wikipedia standards.Ravensfire ( talk) 19:22, 21 January 2019 (UTC)- @
Ravensfire: the link target has subsequently been deleted under G11 so you should probably update your opinion. —
David Eppstein (
talk) 07:20, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you - I hadn't notice that happened but not surprised. Ravensfire ( talk) 15:19, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
- @
Ravensfire: the link target has subsequently been deleted under G11 so you should probably update your opinion. —
David Eppstein (
talk) 07:20, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - There's just not enough here to meet notability requirements and with their company article being deleted under G11, my view is just reinforced. Ravensfire ( talk) 15:19, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. ∯WBG converse 14:30, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ∯WBG converse 14:30, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. ∯WBG converse 14:30, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. ∯WBG converse 14:30, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ∯WBG converse 14:30, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. The Times of India source appears to cover him in-depth, from a reliable source. Everything else is quotes not coverage and spam and churnalism and unreliability and promotionalism. Even if more than one good source were to surface, WP:TNT would apply. — David Eppstein ( talk) 19:10, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.