From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The Bushranger One ping only 00:11, 9 November 2017 (UTC) reply

Hellenic Republic Asset Development Fund

Hellenic Republic Asset Development Fund (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:COMPANY. Found no significant coverage in independent reliable sources. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk, contribs) 00:59, 2 November 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark ( talk) 05:09, 2 November 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark ( talk) 05:09, 2 November 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark ( talk) 05:09, 2 November 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Κeep. A state-run Greek agency with activities that receive wide coverage from the mainstream Greek media. HRADF's activity has been regularly and well documented in IMF's reports on Greece, and Greek economy, e.g. [1], [2].—— Chalk19 ( talk) 13:03, 2 November 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. The only way that the nominator could have failed to find significant coverage in independent reliable sources would be by not looking. The spoon-fed Google Books, Scholar and News searches linked above find hundreds of such sources. The idea of having those links in every deletion discussion is that people should follow them, not ignore them. 86.17.222.157 ( talk) 21:53, 3 November 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep Article itself cites several reliable sources to meet the notability guidelines, and also my searchers here and here show a quite good number of sources to establish the subject's notability. Passes WP:GNG. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 02:35, 5 November 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.