The result was no consensus. It may be prudent to revisit this issue in a few months, and move discussion to the article's talk page for the time being. Cirt ( talk) 18:25, 24 August 2009 (UTC) reply
This is not and cannot be a neutral encyclopedia article; it's a polemical attempt to claim that any access to healthcare is equivalent to explicit rationing of healthcare. In response to my earlier concerns, the page creator has made the page more polemical, not less. Note that there are two separate concerns here: the page contents cannot be a neutral article, and the page title cannot be that of a neutral article, unless healthcare rationing were in fact instituted in the United States. — Gavia immer ( talk) 17:36, 17 August 2009 (UTC) — Gavia immer ( talk) 17:36, 17 August 2009 (UTC) reply