From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 03:54, 22 June 2022 (UTC) reply

Haydite, Missouri

Haydite, Missouri (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NGEO. Satellite image does not show any community. The most significant structure is a plant of BUILDEX] that makes "Light weight expanded shale (Haydite)". Not a legal recognized populated place or anything else that would justify an article. MB 03:48, 15 June 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Missouri. MB 03:48, 15 June 2022 (UTC) reply
  • I'd like to hear from the article creator on this one, but I'm not finding much besides this concrete plant producing Haydite that opened in what appears to be very close to the same area as this location shortly after WWII. The concrete/aggregate product does create a good bit of search engine noise though. Hog Farm Talk 04:09, 15 June 2022 (UTC) reply
    That article shows the product (Haydite) was named after its inventor (Steven Hayde). Then the plant was built in 1947 in New Market, Missouri. I can't verify the GNIS entry either. Perhaps the intersection is called Haydite by some because of the plant, but that does not make a community. MB 04:51, 15 June 2022 (UTC) reply
    Delete; I've been unable to find anything that demonstrates the presence here of anything other than the rail siding and the aggregate plant. Hog Farm Talk 03:05, 16 June 2022 (UTC) reply
  • delete sorting through the topos, there is one which places "Haydite" at one end of the siding for the quarry. It's clearly a rail spot, not a town, of which there is no evidence at all. Mangoe ( talk) 05:39, 15 June 2022 (UTC) reply

Seems to be either a quarry or mine location with associated support buildings and rail sideing. Should be notable as a quarry/commercial site with potential if sufficient referencing is available. Vsmith ( talk) 14:36, 16 June 2022 (UTC) reply

It is very uncommon for a quarry to show notability. Mangoe ( talk) 16:25, 16 June 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.