The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Notability is not inherited, most of the article is not about the subject, but about his ancestors.
WP:BEFORE did not turn up enough in-depth sourcing to show they pass
WP:GNG.
Onel5969TT me 16:23, 7 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete: Very poorly sourced BLP. The article seems to assume notably based on relationships
WP:NOTINHERITED and purely honorary positions. Sources in the article are not
WP:SIGCOV from
WP:ISWP:RS. BLPs should strictly follow guidelines related to notability and sourcing. //
Timothy :: talk 16:46, 7 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources.
Fatzaof (
talk) 17:29, 9 January 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete per
WP:TNT and
WP:BLP. Starting with the lead, this essay about a living person makes no sense. As noted, the honors granted this person are not so important that he gets a free pass from proving notability (Cf.Nobel Peace Prize).
Bearian (
talk) 12:33, 12 January 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.