The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep. Hundreds of citations on several books and articles in what I believe to be a low citation field looks like a pass of
WP:NPROF C1. That's supported by a volume of the Journal of Aesthetic Education that was dedicated to him. His books are widely held by libraries according to WorldCat, and I expect that he'll also pass
WP:NAUTHOR. I've added two reviews so far.
Russ Woodroofe (
talk) 22:43, 22 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep per meeting
WP:ANYBIO,
WP:PROF, and
WP:AUTHOR as explained above. Great example of
WP:HEYMANN. This is a terrible nomination. The subject is not recently deceased as claimed above (died in 1998). I'm curious, did the nominator do a
WP:BEFORE? His bio is included in multiple encyclopedias
[1][2]. Google scholar
[3] reveals his works are highly cited.
TJMSmith (
talk) 23:53, 22 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep. I can only assume BEFORE was not done, since it's not hard to find refs like the ones I just reformatted (
[4]) which clearly suggest he is notable, having had other scholars write articles about him. He clearly meets
WP:PROF. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
reply here 02:01, 23 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Withdraw nomination per all above. Thanks for your hard work.
Boleyn (
talk) 06:44, 23 April 2020 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.