From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:05, 4 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Harry B. Cohen

Harry B. Cohen (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Person of only local or at best regional notability. The Order of Canada does not confer sufficient notability as more than 150 of them are given out each year. Softlavender ( talk) 03:50, 28 March 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen ( talk) 08:15, 28 March 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen ( talk) 08:15, 28 March 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Comment from nominator: Article was created and written by a sock farm; see WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Keevaymusic. -- Softlavender ( talk) 10:33, 28 March 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete as creation of sockpuppet, without prejudice against recreation if somebody else is willing to take it on. The Order of Canada is a notable distinction that counts as a valid notability claim — the number of people who receive it annually is a standard that's applied to lower-level distinctions like the Queen Elizabeth II Silver Jubilee Medal, not to the OC, so he does have valid grounds for inclusion. What's more determinative here is the sockpuppet problem — for denial of attribution reasons, we have to delete content created by sockpuppets of already-banned editors, and then permit recreation by somebody else. Bearcat ( talk) 17:05, 28 March 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Comment, only around 7,000 recipients in 50 years of this high ranking award, a recipient is definitely notable, with appropriate sources of course, nevertheless, agree with Bearcat that article needs to be deleted, then can be recreated later. Coolabahapple ( talk) 21:42, 28 March 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete as creation of sock farm. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:25, 30 March 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete as creation of a sock farm. scope_creep ( talk) 10:40, 31 March 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.