The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 03:34, 1 August 2007 (UTC)reply
delete-junior highs are not inherently notable.
Chris 01:55, 28 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Weak Delete per lack of notability
Corpx 16:09, 28 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom.
GreenJoe 04:40, 30 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom, Caknuck and GreenJoe.
Bearian 13:44, 30 July 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.