The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 15:38, 18 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Non notable entrepreneur who fails to satisfy our notability criteria. They lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources hence fail GNG.
WP:BASIC and
WP:ANYBIO are also not satisfied. A before search turns up unreliable self written pieces such as
this and announcements Celestina007 (
talk) 12:16, 11 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment as per
WP: CREATIVE. Agreeing with
Celestina007 on point lacking significant coverage. Maximum sources are secondry. And the mentioned link( above) was never a part of the page.
Source no.4 is used to support the content only[1]. Page should be considered as per
Wikipedia:Notability (academics). Thanks and regards
RAJIVVASUDEV (
talk) 06:22, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
RAJIVVASUDEV (
talk) 08:29, 12 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment — Are you sure you wouldn’t want to use the AFC process until you understand policies? You just cited both CREATIVE & NACADEMIC for a businessman and If I may ask how does that work? You also agreed that the subject of the article lacked significant coverage which is required by GNG and yet you !voted a keep? Anyway it would be counter intuitive if an article creator !voted to delete his own article. Furthermore please see both
WP:COI &
WP:PAID. Celestina007 (
talk) 07:44, 12 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Surprising I appreciated your observations and tried to improve the page (which is allowed when the discussion continues ) and dropped a message[
[1]]
at your talk page also, but this contention[
[2]] is unacceptable. Maybe I contested it wrongly but how this can drive to
WP:PAID. Thanks
RAJIVVASUDEV (
talk) 08:22, 12 December 2020 (UTC)reply
My message on your talk page copying here: Respected
Celestina007, Greetings of the day! First of all, I acknowledge your review and every action on the subject page. I am here to seek your advice. After your observations, I have revised many parts of the page. Kindly guide me if it is workable now or I should give up? Thank you and best regards
RAJIVVASUDEV (
talk) 06:58, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
RAJIVVASUDEV (
talk) 08:33, 12 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per well formed argument of nominator.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 21:18, 15 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. Another article about a dude with a job, doesn't meet
WP:BIO.
FalconK (
talk) 04:29, 17 December 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.