The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:17, 21 April 2018 (UTC)reply
The contemporaneous news coverage isn't enough to meet GNG. "Sources" should be secondary sources, as those provide the most objective evidence of notability., and I would consider these all to be primary sources.
power~enwiki (
π,
ν) 01:25, 13 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Speedy keep There is coverage in reliable sources here, and how could they possibly be "primary", it's a swan?
★Trekker (
talk) 01:30, 13 April 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.