From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to S. Radha Krishna. Liz Read! Talk! 22:22, 28 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Haarika and Hassine Creations

Haarika and Hassine Creations (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Bringing this here for discussion. The main factor that sets this apart from the 2017 and 2020 deletions that led to the SALTing of Haarika & Hassine Creations is the release of Ala Vaikunthapurramuloo which is unquestionably notable. The award, and a lot of the coverage speaks to the film and I'm not sure whether that rolls up to the production company and or S. Radha Krishna, which is why I'm not necessarily advocating for a merger to the founder. SInce they have been involved with other films, merger to the notable one doesn't quite work either. Thoughts? Tips on N:ORG level coverage for the production company? If this is deemed notable, I think the other title should be unSALTed and this moved as it is the DBA. Star Mississippi 22:12, 30 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:27, 7 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:48, 14 July 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Keep: This production company is highly notable production company in Telugu film industry. NaanReady ( talk) 05:57, 17 July 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete, the subject does not meet WP:NORG. Only 10 of the article's references mention the subject. Eight of them just mention that it is the production company for a film. The other two just seem to list the films that it has produced in prose. This is all trivial coverage. The awards are for the films not the production company. SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 15:30, 20 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:22, 21 July 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Merge to S. Radha Krishna as a new L2 section, otherwise delete per SailingInABathTub. We are in that odd liminal space where the same facts lead to opposite results as applied to an individual vs. a company, so merging to the individual who is deeply (and apparently exclusively?) linked to the company seems like the best way to preserve encyclopedic content. This can seem like an oddly bureaucratic result but there are reasons for it. I am not sure if any of the tables should be merged, but at least the content of the lead and Production sections can be (and therefore should be). -- Visviva ( talk) 15:14, 22 July 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect and merge appropriate content to S. Radha Krishna, the company on its own fails GNG/NCORP criteria. HighKing ++ 17:06, 23 July 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Merge per Visviva. We have an almost identical "liminal" situation (personal vs. corporate) at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BoND - also relisted 3 times.
-- A. B. ( talkcontribsglobal count) 21:35, 27 July 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.