The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Pax:Vobiscum ( talk) 13:51, 17 March 2020 (UTC) reply

HP FlexNetwork Architecture

HP FlexNetwork Architecture (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to meet the notability guideline for organisations, which also applies to products and services. Neither the references in the article, or any other coverage I've been able to find, constitutes significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Many of the sources cited are of dubious reliability and several fail to mention the subject of the article. (Previously prodded and deprodded in 2012; thanks to Phil Bridger for pointing this out.) –  Arms & Hearts ( talk) 14:51, 6 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. –  Arms & Hearts ( talk) 14:51, 6 March 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete. Most importantly, I cannot find significant coverage of this in independent reliable sources. I would add that as it stands the article is pure advertising. It tells us over and over again how wonderful this architecture is, but at no point does it actually tell us what it is. Phil Bridger ( talk) 10:31, 7 March 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete. Probably meets WP:G11, and/or WP:G12 ( see earwig report). -- RoySmith (talk) 17:13, 16 March 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.