From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep as the nomination was obviously in bad faith. Brandon ( talk) 15:47, 28 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Héctor Martín Cantero

Héctor Martín Cantero (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not notable enough to require a wikipedia article Honey-badger24 ( talk) 00:36, 27 July 2021 (UTC) Creating deletion discussion for Héctor Martín Cantero reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Eastmain ( talkcontribs) 04:32, 27 July 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Eastmain ( talkcontribs) 04:33, 27 July 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Eastmain ( talkcontribs) 04:33, 27 July 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Keep Firstly, per WP:AUTHOR, Hector Martin is notable. His work has been repeatedly reviewed in multiple works. It has been reviewed in nationwide Spanish newspapers, various technical news websites and academic publications. See the third point: "The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of an independent and notable work (for example, a book, film, or television series, but usually not a single episode of a television series) or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews."
Secondly, you seem to have been launching a personal attack against Hector Martin on the talk page on the Kiwi Farms Wikipedia page here. Please don't do that and especially not on Wikipedia. Thanks. PhotographyEdits ( talk) 14:54, 27 July 2021 (UTC) reply
This article is a vanity page. He isn't notable. If he was, this site would be filled with articles like this. Also, the Kiwi Farms article linked ne to this, and I was amazed that his vanity page was allowed to stay up. Him being a liar has nothing to do with me wanting this removed. He's not of any real note enough to have a wiki article. That's the point I'm making, not about him lying about some mentally ill guy faking a suicide. Honey-badger24 ( talk) 01:06, 28 July 2021 (UTC) reply
Oh, and PhotographyEdits is more than likely Hector himself, so, Hi Hector! Honey-badger24 ( talk) 01:08, 28 July 2021 (UTC) reply
Hi KiwiFarmer! This is Hector, your trolling is very transparent, and PhotographyEdits is *definitely* a sockpuppet of mine even though they have more edits this year than I've ever made since creating my Wikipedia account in 2004. /s Marcan ( talk) 04:25, 28 July 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Keep Sourced well enough to get over the wiki-notability bar. A news search finds more that could potentially be added; note that not all publications use the "Cantero" part of his name. XOR'easter ( talk) 16:31, 27 July 2021 (UTC) reply
Note that at least based on my understanding of MOS:PATRONYMIC and Spanish naming customs, "Martín" is the patronymic and "Cantero" is the matronymic, and the matronymic is generally not used in common names. (However, I don't know much about names, so I may be misunderstanding things here.) -- Pokechu22 ( talk) 18:53, 27 July 2021 (UTC) reply
This is correct. I generally do not use my full name, just "Hector Martin" (without the diacritics), when identifying myself online, even though my legal name is correct in the article title. (In case it wasn't clear, I had nothing to do with the creation of the article nor am I going to try to influence its fate in any way, but I'm happy to answer any questions.) Marcan ( talk) 04:30, 28 July 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.