- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 10:17, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Gulnar Virk Krishna
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Gulnar Virk Krishna ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable, doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:BIO. In search results, her name appears in the context of "wife-of" or "bride-of" her notable husband. Of the four sources cited, the first is a self-placed advertisement, two say virtually nothing about her, and one speaks of her involvement in one event. Largoplazo ( talk) 13:02, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Largoplazo ( talk) 13:02, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 13:29, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
- Merge to the more notable Aadarsh Balakrishna. I did clean up the spam, but the claim for notability is extremely slim. More sourcing than one might expect, so I will do a check on sources, and may (unlikely) come back with a keep vote. JamieWhat ( talk) 14:21, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
- No, still agree with merging over the personal life info. Looks like they have a kid now. JamieWhat ( talk) 14:39, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
- I disagree with moving the detailed information about her to his article, giving undue weight to information that isn't about him, WP:COATRACK. That would amount to a subterfuge to get around WP:N by embedding an article about her into an article about him. Largoplazo ( talk) 18:06, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
- delete without merge/redirect: subject doesnt have significant coverage. She fails WP:BASIC, as well as general notability criteria. Even though redirects are cheap, we should not be awarding them because someone tried to create an article of a subject who has passing mentions. Especially to the entities trying to promote themselves, like the subject here seems to be doing. Futher reading: WP:TROPHY, and WP:ANOT#ENTITLEMENT. —usernamekiran (talk) 17:15, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
- ? Neither of those links has anything to do with the discussion about hand. Largoplazo ( talk) 17:58, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
- directly? No. But the essence is the same. We should not be giving out (awarding) redirects because someone tried to promote themselves, or just because the subject achieved to get (verifiably) connected with something else notable. Like non notable CEO of notable company, or in some cases subject acheiving to get married to someone notable. —usernamekiran (talk) 10:29, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete – Fails general notability guidelines. I was unable to find any sources to establish that she's eligible for inclusion at this time. Missvain ( talk) 22:28, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.