- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Daniel ( talk) 10:02, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Guide (Adventist magazine)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Guide (Adventist magazine) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Consensus was not reached with the last deletion discussion, and I still think this magazine is not notable. Per Devonian Wombat: “no one has actually shown that this magazine passes WP:GNG, only one source has been found which actually contributes to notability, with the rest being either primary sources, passing mentions or not actually about the subject. As a result, this magazine still fails GNG.” Dronebogus ( talk) 23:55, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Dronebogus ( talk) 23:55, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep 1) I note the one source clearly identified in the previous AfD has not been added to the article. 2) There is ISBN 978-0828027304 which appears to be a 'greatest hits' compilation published by separate (but likely also SDA affiliated) publishing house, which appears to be commercially available and held by a handful of libraries per WorldCat. Jclemens ( talk) 00:06, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep with the addition of the book source (directly about the subject) we now have two sources showing substantial coverage so that WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 ( talk) 01:11, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
- Weak Keep -- A specialist magazine which has been published for 67 years is worth having an article on, even if there are relatively few truly independent sources. Peterkingiron ( talk) 14:26, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.