The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep -- Ynot? 00:00, 23 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Just being really old does not equal notablilty. A minor obituary is insignificant and does not pass
WP:BIO.
Reywas92Talk 22:08, 15 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete, lacks notability for it's own article, but possibly merge into other articles of simular subject?
Alan -
talk 05:13, 16 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Keep. The Netherlands has over 16 million persons. Ms. Jansen-Anker was the oldest Dutch person for more than a year.
Ryoung122 12:32, 21 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Strong keep. Grietje Jansen-Anker is quite notable. She was not merely really old; 112-year-olds are literally rarer than one in a million. (Consider: of around 7 billion people on Earth, only a hundred or so are 110 years old. 112-year-olds are considerably rarer still.) Mrs. Jansen-Anker was also the very last living Dutch person born in the 19th century.
Her obituary is not minor, as it was carried by many sources in the Netherlands; I also counted 38 news items about her since 2006, when she turned 110. Several international sources, including some in English, also exist. She attracted attention while still alive, both for being over 110 and for being the oldest person in the Netherlands. Naturally, the Gerontology Research Group also included her in its reports for several years.
As for WP:BIO, note qualification #2 of the "Any biography" section: "The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field." As a superstar of aging, how does she not qualify?
All that said, the article could be merged into articles on the oldest people in 2008 (2009, 2007, etc.), oldest people in the Netherlands, etc. However, that may result in duplication of information in several articles. It seems easier to link to a single article for each person.
Zomno (
talk) 12:47, 21 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete. 'Notability is not temporary' - she's generated a few fleeting news reports, not enough for her own article.
Jnthn0898 (
talk) 12:56, 21 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Yes, she's generated quite a few news reports, but they definitely are not "fleeting". See the sources provided in my comment below.
Cunard (
talk) 00:31, 22 November 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.