The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete - Small subdivision fails GEOLAND. Interestingly, GNIS cites the "Champion Map Corporation", not a government source. –
dlthewave☎ 02:25, 17 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
xinbenlvTalk,
Remember to "ping" me 05:39, 21 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete A non-notable subdivision that fails GEOLAND. This discussion should not have even been relisted.
Devonian Wombat (
talk) 11:53, 21 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.