The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep.
Cabayi (
talk) 06:47, 12 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Repurpose as
Grand Fenwick series and delete the trivia. The novels, the film adaptations, etc. are worth an article.
Clarityfiend (
talk) 05:45, 5 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Redirect to the author's article or repurpose as stated above if the series has enough potential as an article. The fictional location itself does not seem to have enough content at this time as a standalone topic.
TTN (
talk) 11:47, 5 May 2021 (UTC)reply
KeepUncle G has identified a good substantial source above and it is easy to find more such as
this and
that. The topic therefore passes
WP:GNG and numerous policies indicate that deletion is not appropriate including
WP:ATD,
WP:NEXIST,
WP:NOTPAPER and
WP:PRESERVE.
Andrew🐉(
talk) 20:42, 5 May 2021 (UTC)reply
I totally agree with KEEP. Four books and two movies surely qualifies as important enough. We have many articles of lesser themes. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
2603:7000:6a01:ad31:7563:1ab1:35be:1251 (
talk •
contribs) 10:44, 8 May 2021 (UTC)reply
keep per rationale provided by Uncle G. ☆★Mamushir (
✉✉) 19:37, 8 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.