The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Strong Keep This organisation is indeed
notable in Christendom. I hope this helps. With regards,
AnupamTalk 23:13, 30 January 2012 (UTC)reply
Strong Keep The GFA has received substantial coverage in books and newspapers, including a degree of
controversy. The nominator is reminded of
WP:BEFORE. --
202.124.73.141 (
talk) 23:16, 30 January 2012 (UTC)reply
Comment. Several reliable sources have been added to the article. Given the extremely high level of controversy about the GFA in India, I find the nomination incomprehensible. --
202.124.72.101 (
talk) —Preceding
undated comment added 12:07, 31 January 2012 (UTC).reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Martijn Hoekstra (
talk) 13:11, 7 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Keep. Since the nomination, the lack-of-sourcing issue that was the entire reason to delete has been fixed. –
Ugncreative Usergname (
talk) 15:14, 7 February 2012 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.