The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Consensus is that the article does not meet the notability guidelines.
Davewild (
talk) 07:26, 14 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete - software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up no significant
WP:RS coverage of this software. Article was created by an
SPA with a name similar to the developer, so likely promotional.
Dialectric (
talk) 02:25, 1 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:16, 6 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete for now as recently released software with no noticeable coverage aside from results for an apparently different GOCS.
SwisterTwistertalk 21:10, 6 June 2015 (UTC)reply
I'm the author of go-cs and my impression was that Wikipedia welcomes software developers to list their software especially when it is Open Source. The coverage in Wikipedia (which is itself an Open Source project) help us Open Source developers. Go-cs is a recent project, but already adopted in a few companies that I know about. It is one of the official Golang projects listed at
https://github.com/golang/go/wiki/Projects and
https://code.google.com/p/go-wiki/wiki/Projects. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Andy.kosela (
talk •
contribs) 13:43, 12 June 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.