From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that the article does not meet the notability guidelines. Davewild ( talk) 07:26, 14 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Go-cs

Go-cs (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG, confirmed after multiple source searches. North America 1000 18:13, 29 May 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 18:13, 29 May 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 18:13, 29 May 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage of this software. Article was created by an SPA with a name similar to the developer, so likely promotional. Dialectric ( talk) 02:25, 1 June 2015 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 01:16, 6 June 2015 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.