The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —  JJMC89 ( T· C) 23:35, 12 April 2019 (UTC) reply

GmailFS

GmailFS (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of significant coverage in third party sources. There's a little here and there but I don't see significant coverage from multiple sources. - Samuel Wiki ( talk) 13:05, 5 April 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 13:13, 5 April 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 13:13, 5 April 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 13:13, 5 April 2019 (UTC) reply

• Delete I found a number of discussions on different web forums and blogs, but no significant coverage from independent sources to establish notability -- DannyS712 ( talk) 21:41, 6 April 2019 (UTC) reply
• Delete. I have checked the previous AfD nomination and visited the links presented in "keeps". They aren't reliable. Further Google search returned around 11,000 results which most appears to be unreliable, too; therefore, there is no significant coverage on the topic and fails WP:GNG. -- Hiwilms ( talk) 10:13, 11 April 2019 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.