The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete. ( non-admin closure) Greenbörg (talk) 07:26, 22 September 2017 (UTC) reply

Global Industrial Defence Solutions

Global Industrial Defence Solutions (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No in-depth coverage about this company found. Fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. Greenbörg (talk) 07:53, 9 September 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 09:44, 9 September 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 09:44, 9 September 2017 (UTC) reply

• Keep It is one of the only four drone manufacturers in Pakistan, appears to be a major defence company [1]. Mar4d ( talk) 10:06, 9 September 2017 (UTC) reply

I said, 'there is no in-depth coverage' and that point remains. Have a look at WP:INHERITORG which says 'No inherited notability'. Subject fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Greenbörg (talk) 15:35, 20 September 2017 (UTC) reply

• Delete No indications of notability, fails GNG and WP:NCORP. Article currently reads like a catalogue and is promotional, fails WP:SPIP. The tribune.com.pk reference above is a passing mention and fails WP:CORPDEPTH. -- HighKing ⁺⁺ 11:51, 21 September 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.