The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Not notable, CSD repeatedly removed by creator, promotional by COI editor. GregJackPBoomer! 11:35, 12 September 2012 (UTC)reply
Comment - I would say that the information given is important. You need to give a chance to the members of the public to present factual information. It may have looked initially as promotional, but in fact at the moment it is just factual. I'm sure that further reviews will improve it. I may guess that
GregJackP will decide to revise his speedy decision. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
109.144.197.42 (
talk) 14:30, 12 September 2012 (UTC)reply
Comment. What does factual have to do with it? Thus far, it has not shown notability as shown by independent, reliable, verifiable sources. Providing promotional informational to the public is not the purpose of the project. GregJackPBoomer! 17:54, 12 September 2012 (UTC)reply
Delete - Non-notable, lacking GHIts and GNEWS of substance. Article written by COI.
reddogsix (
talk) 14:43, 12 September 2012 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.