From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 18:02, 25 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Ghum Hai Kisi key Pyaar Mein

Ghum Hai Kisi key Pyaar Mein (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article does not pass WP:GNG or WP:NTV. BEFORE revealed promo pieces and database style entries. Nothing that meets WP:SIGCOV that addresses the subject directly and indepth. Also searched under Ghum Hai Kisi Ke Pyar Mein.   //  Timothy ::  talk  17:11, 18 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.   //  Timothy ::  talk  17:11, 18 September 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.   //  Timothy ::  talk  17:11, 18 September 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Strong Keep: American editors need to understand that tv production in India works a little differently. Unlike in the US where a script is first pitched to a network which then recieves a pilot order and then a series order, in India tv networks pick up shows on the basis of the script and trusted Production houses only. Also, unlike the US where upfronts take place in May to advertise upcoming shows for Fall (their plots and cast), in India new shows are usually announced not more than six weeks before they air on tv, so there isn't much in terms of pre-production to actually report. Like in this case, the first report of the series being developed came out only three weeks ago [1]. Yes, technically the article shouldn't have been created before the series premiere but that ship has now sailed. Improving the page to meet Wiki standard makes more sense now than deletion. With the series premiere only two weeks away, i'm sure that the bigger platforms like Hindustan Times, Times of India, Tribune etc will also cover the show in depth, which is exactly what happened in the case of Lockdown Ki Love Story. A few more articles about the series: [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] There are many more from TellyChakkar, but it isn't classified as a reliable source so I haven't added those here. Sunshine1191 ( talk) 02:10, 19 September 2020 (UTC) reply
    No one can predict whether this show will be notable. It may very well just have routine, run of the mill,promo coverage. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, articles shouldn't be created because someone thinks it might be notable someday. None of the sources you list show notability. They are routine, run of the mill promo pieces.   //  Timothy ::  talk  03:40, 19 September 2020 (UTC) reply
Then care to explain why Call Your Mother has had a Wikipedia article since 22 May 2020. Mid-season is still 4 months away (8 months in May). If a series that doesn't even have a tentative launch date yet can have an article then why can't one whose launch date is only two weeks away! Sunshine1191 ( talk) 05:54, 19 September 2020 (UTC) reply
Sunshine1191, Good find, you should nominate it. But OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid argument.   //  Timothy ::  talk  07:27, 19 September 2020 (UTC) reply
  • I Change my vote to Delete. To clarify however, it is not because I feel my previous reasoning is inapt. My argument was never about OTHERSTUFFEXISTS but about the logistics of it all. This Afd will close on the 25th and the series will premiere on the 5th. Deletion for 10 days still seems completely pointless to me. The reason for my change of opinion is Technical. The promo released by Star Plus states the series title as Ghum Hai Kisikey Pyaar Mein not Ghum Hai Kisi key Pyaar Mein, and considering the poor quality of the current article and the surplus of redirects on Wikipedia, deletion and proper recreation looks like the best option. Sunshine1191 ( talk) 16:11, 19 September 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete as not notable since all the article about it extremely brief mentions and also WP:TOSOON applies. It's not like the article can't be recreated if (or when) it is released and becomes notable anyway. Also, just an FYI "other stuff exists" isn't a good AfD argument. -- Adamant1 ( talk) 07:23, 19 September 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.