The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
speedy merge to Gilgit River. This nomination shouldn't have been necessary in the first place, but apparently nobody is looking at merge requests. There's practically no content here beyond that already in the target article, and each lists the other as a synonym.
Mangoe (
talk) 14:18, 29 September 2020 (UTC)reply
This is an obvious merge, so can be achieved by bold editing without any discussion being needed.
Phil Bridger (
talk) 12:44, 30 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Merge as suggested.
Mccapra (
talk) 07:31, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.