The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Advertisement of the company. references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject.
Timberlack (
talk) 06:40, 16 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for
lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for
soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. --
Cewbot (
talk) 00:02, 24 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Suggesting keep or no-consensus close: As with some other recent AfDs, I am wary of those whose nomination may be problematic, as with the blocked account in this case. Under the 2012 AfD, editors with keep opinions pointed to several media items; from the descriptions, some may also meet the current
WP:NCORP but they are not now available online. Searches now find material mainly about the 2013 acquisition (
[1] - routine coverage under
WP:CORPDEPTH) and the company's closure in 2016, such as
"Six real reasons behind AskMe shutting down", Business Today 31 August 2016. Although that is a news-driven analysis, it might also contribute towards
WP:NCORP.
AllyD (
talk) 15:38, 24 February 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.