- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:58, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Gery woelfel
- Gery woelfel ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. No reliable references. Fbdave ( talk) 23:40, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 04:53, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 04:53, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete, sources presented are trivial, and I found no significant coverage in other online sources. Does not appear to meet WP:GNG, WP:BIO, or WP:JOURNALIST. GAB gab 13:55, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: Does not meet WP:PERSON as all sources are either incidental or non-independent. Hazarasp ( talk) 14:26, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. No indicia of encyclopedic notability. bd2412 T 16:48, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 04:19, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: fails WP:BIO. DrStrauss talk 16:35, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - can't find any significant coverage on him - only his columns. TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 19:33, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.